Originalni naučni rad/Original scientific paper
UDC 327::911.3]:316.32
DOI 10.7251/HER1915037DJ
DOWNLOAD .pdf
Dejan Đorđević1 i Nevena Vasiljević2
1Geografski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Srbija
2Šumarski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Srbija
Sažetak: Rad predstavlja seriju tzv. Kritičkih geografija, odnosno primera ekonomskih, ekoloških i socщalnih izazova sa prostornom dimenzщom, te prikaza neuspeha politika koje su na te izazove pokušale da od;ovore usled zanemarivanja prostornog načina mišljenja. Zbog različigih razloga a pod svemoćnom senkom mondijalističkog koncepta, politike i odlučivanje retko obuhvataju posledщe na način na koji koristimo zemljište i to na različitim mestima.. Zanemarivanje mesta u geografskom smislu odnosno načina na koji politike imaju uticaj na konkretan prostor dovelo je do negativnih ekonomskih, socщalnih i ekoloških efekata. U radu su dati modašpeti u okviru kojih bi prostorni način mišljenja mogao biti inkorporiran u proces odlučivanja, sa posebnim osvrtom na razvoj prostornih analitičkih karti za kreatore politika jednu vrstu, GIS-a za političare”. Mnogim zemljama nedostaju studije o prostornim posledщama ekonomskih i
socijalnih politika i programa, te o utщaju njihove međusobne interakcije na ukupan razvoj države.
Ključne reči: Kritika geografija, mesto, prostor, mondijalizacija, šlaniranje, kartiranje
Dejan Dordević1 and Nevena Vasiljević2
1Faculty of Geography, University of Belgrade, Serbia
2Faculty of ForestlY, University of Belgrade, Serbia
Abstract: This paper presents a series of “critical geographies”: examples of economic, environmental and social challenges with a spatial dimension, and the way that policy has failed to respond adequately to them with place and space in mind. Overshadowed by the globalization/mondialisation concept, for a variety of reasons, policy- and decision-making too rarely incorporate the implications of the ways we use the land and the consequences for different places. The neglect of place, in particular the way that different policies combine to affect places in different ways, has contributed to a range of negative economic, social and environmental outcomes. This paper makes some suggestions for ways in which spatial thinking can be advanced in policy- and decision making. In particular, to advance a greater spatial intelligence, we need to develop central spatial analytical maps for policy-makers — a kind of “GIS for policy”. Many countries lack single documents which provide an overarching framework about the spatial dimension of policies and programmes, and how they interact (including the consequences) to affect the development of the county.
Key words: critical geography, place, space, globalisation, planning, mapping
CITIRAJTE (Cite this article):
Đorđević, D., & Vasiljević, N. (2015). Misliti i delovati prostorno: mondijalizacija, kritička geografija i planiranje. Herald, 19, 37−58. doi:10.7251/HER1915037DJ
Đorđević, D., & Vasiljević, N. (2015). Thinking and Acting Spatially: Globalisation, Critical Geography and Planning. Herald, 19, 37−58. doi:10.7251/HER1915037DJ